View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
brad Site Admin
Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Posts: 490 Location: Atlanta, GA USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would probably lean toward still calling it GTK. It is targeted toward that specific library. I think we've been using linux incorrectly to name it, but that may be what we have to do in the version() {} blocks.
The modules in the current tree were dependency-traced to the two imports in HelloWorld.d As you can see, a lot of modules are used for that. As they abstract up, we hit all the major classes. Drag-n-Drop will be another fun example to convert... _________________ I really like the vest! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JJR
Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Posts: 1104
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ant wrote: |
JJR wrote: | Or are you suggesting that it's better to completely separate the two d source files so that we have a clearer separation of the 2 OS ports. |
yes,
This way we have only one source tree but it will be easier
to work on each version.
so, is it 2 against 1?
Ant |
Ha ha, yeah I guess you got me beat. That's ok. I was just making sure I understand your approach. Your reasons are sound.
Later,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|