View previous topic :: View next topic |
Would you use a dependency injection framework for D? |
Yes |
|
66% |
[ 2 ] |
Maybe -- I don't have a use for it right now |
|
33% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 3 |
|
Author |
Message |
dhasenan
Joined: 03 Feb 2005 Posts: 73 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:45 am Post subject: dmocks: plans |
|
|
A mock objects library is not a thing that will be in continual development. At this stage, I think I have everything that's essential to a mocks library in subversion; it'll be a matter of refactoring for beauty and ease of use from here on. (Except for ordering. I'm not terribly happy with how that is at the moment, though I'm not sure how it should look.)
Consequently, I expect the project to be essentially finished as of the end of the year, at which time it will just be a matter of updating to the latest versions of DMD (and eventually converting to Tango, probably offering both options once Tango is available for DMD2).
That leaves other aspects of unit testing open. An assertion library might be convenient, with a fluent interface; it could give more accurate error messages that you wouldn't have to write manually.
But there's not much else to be done with unittests. So I will be working on other issues, probably with an attributes library and a dependency injection framework. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fraserofthenight
Joined: 08 Apr 2007 Posts: 33 Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|